Belmont (city) |
|
|---|---|
| Location |
North Carolina United States North America |
| Total Power Plants | 16 |
| Red Alerts |
|
| Elected Officials |
Sen. Elizabeth Dole (R)
555 Dirksen Senate Office Building tel: 202-224-6342 | fax: 202-224-1100
Sen. Richard Burr (R)
217 Russell Senate Office Building tel: 202-224-3154 | fax: 202-228-2981 |
Power Trends
For more about the terms or data used here, search the Glossary, learn All About Icons, or check out our FAQs. Information on plant specifics can be found here. If you use the data, please see our citation policy.
| Tons CO2 | MWh Energy | Intensity | % Fossil | % Hydro | % Nuclear | % Other Renewable | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000: | 9,051,241 | 27,200,000 | 665 | 31.83 | 0.22 | 67.76 | 0 |
| Present: | 9,572,146 | 28,400,000 | 675 | 35.34 | 0.47 | 64.01 | 0 |
| Future: | 9,629,811 | 28,400,000 | 678 | 35.48 | 0.47 | 63.86 | 0 |
Top Power Producing Plants in the Belmont Area
Highest CO2 Emitting Plants in the Belmont Area
| Tons CO2 | MWh Energy | Intensity | |||
|
|
North America
United States
North Carolina
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
5,914,264
6,949,546
6,985,744
|
5,810,125
7,389,772
7,431,067
|
2,036
1,881
1,880
|
|
|
North America
United States
North Carolina
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
2,674,171
2,390,418
2,404,025
|
2,358,976
2,409,328
2,425,359
|
2,267
1,984
1,982
|
|
|
North America
United States
North Carolina
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
366,070
129,866
133,704
|
446,866
164,516
167,825
|
1,638
1,579
1,593
|
|
|
North America
United States
North Carolina
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
86,139
87,215
87,988
|
47,840
48,494
48,964
|
3,601
3,597
3,594
|
|
|
North America
United States
North Carolina
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
5,954
6,029
6,082
|
2,575
2,610
2,635
|
4,625
4,620
4,616
|
Blog
For the time being, there will be no change to the data on the site, which remains unchanged from the CARMA 2.0 release in August, 2008. Our hope is to make the upgraded database public within six months.
Check back with the CARMA blog for updates as the new database comes together.

The airwaves have recently been filled with advertisements heralding a plethora of clean energy technologies. GE promoted its smart grid technologies in a Wizard of Oz-themed Super Bowl ad. Vestas, the largest wind turbine manufacturer in the world, has branded itself No. 1 in Modern Energy. Various groups have designed commercials touting the potential of "clean coal," including a GE ad featuring models-turned-miners (tagline: "Harnessing the power of coal is looking more beautiful every day."). And environmental groups have struck back against the branding of coal as "clean" with satirical advertisements (tagline: "Clean coal harnesses the awesome power of the word ‘clean!’". In this maelstrom of marketing, who can say which clean energy technology is best?
Nearly two years after the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to determine whether greenhouse gases (GHGs) pose a threat to peoples’ health or welfare – the first step toward regulation -- the EPA this week issued a draft rule on a national GHG registry:
On March 2, thousands of people are expected to engage in mass civil disobedience at the coal-fired Capitol Power Plant in Washington, DC. The protest, which is expected to include NASA climate scientist Jim Hanson, author Wendell Barry, and environmentalist Bill McKibben is timed to coincide with the final day of PowerShift09, a four-day "National Youth Summit" that aims to bring 10,000 students to Washington to lobby for action on climate change.Go to carma.org/blog/earth/ to learn more, or check out the screenshots below to get a taste of CARMA's latest incarnation.
Reactions
Live nearby? Work here? Just have a reaction about this? Share your thoughts with us!
Need help translating? Check out Google Translate.
Add a Reaction
Fields marked with a * are required.
| Name * | |
| E-mail * | |
| Website | |
| Your Reaction * | |
| Subscribe to CARMA Newsletter | |





