Finney (county) |
|
|---|---|
| Location |
Kansas United States North America |
| Total Power Plants | 5 |
| Red Alerts |
|
| Elected Officials |
Rep. Jerry Moran (R) 2202 Longworth HOB tel: 202-225-2715 | fax: 202-225-5124 jerry.moran@mail.house.gov
Sen. Sam Brownback (R)
303 Hart Senate Office Building tel: 202-224-6521 | fax: 202-228-1265
Sen. Pat Roberts (R)
109 Hart Senate Office Building tel: 202-224-4774 | fax: 202-224-3514 |
Power Trends
For more about the terms or data used here, search the Glossary, learn All About Icons, or check out our FAQs. Information on plant specifics can be found here. If you use the data, please see our citation policy.
| Tons CO2 | MWh Energy | Intensity | % Fossil | % Hydro | % Nuclear | % Other Renewable | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000: | 2,845,469 | 2,645,805 | 2,151 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Present: | 3,106,679 | 3,115,857 | 1,994 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Future: | 11,100,000 | 10,900,000 | 2,038 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
Top Power Producing Plants in Finney
Highest CO2 Emitting Plants in Finney
| Tons CO2 | MWh Energy | Intensity | |||
|
|
North America
United States
Kansas
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
2,727,366
3,081,538
3,115,436
|
2,464,502
3,073,698
3,109,736
|
2,213
2,005
2,004
|
|
|
North America
United States
Kansas
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
116,267
23,274
24,150
|
179,205
40,023
41,402
|
1,298
1,163
1,167
|
|
|
North America
United States
Kansas
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
1,383
1,407
1,434
|
1,615
1,644
1,679
|
1,714
1,711
1,709
|
|
|
North America
United States
Kansas
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
452
460
469
|
483
492
503
|
1,871
1,869
1,866
|
|
|
North America
United States
Kansas
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
0
0
7,963,992
|
0
0
7,745,112
|
0
0
2,057
|
Blog
For the time being, there will be no change to the data on the site, which remains unchanged from the CARMA 2.0 release in August, 2008. Our hope is to make the upgraded database public within six months.
Check back with the CARMA blog for updates as the new database comes together.

The airwaves have recently been filled with advertisements heralding a plethora of clean energy technologies. GE promoted its smart grid technologies in a Wizard of Oz-themed Super Bowl ad. Vestas, the largest wind turbine manufacturer in the world, has branded itself No. 1 in Modern Energy. Various groups have designed commercials touting the potential of "clean coal," including a GE ad featuring models-turned-miners (tagline: "Harnessing the power of coal is looking more beautiful every day."). And environmental groups have struck back against the branding of coal as "clean" with satirical advertisements (tagline: "Clean coal harnesses the awesome power of the word ‘clean!’". In this maelstrom of marketing, who can say which clean energy technology is best?
Nearly two years after the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to determine whether greenhouse gases (GHGs) pose a threat to peoples’ health or welfare – the first step toward regulation -- the EPA this week issued a draft rule on a national GHG registry:
On March 2, thousands of people are expected to engage in mass civil disobedience at the coal-fired Capitol Power Plant in Washington, DC. The protest, which is expected to include NASA climate scientist Jim Hanson, author Wendell Barry, and environmentalist Bill McKibben is timed to coincide with the final day of PowerShift09, a four-day "National Youth Summit" that aims to bring 10,000 students to Washington to lobby for action on climate change.Go to carma.org/blog/earth/ to learn more, or check out the screenshots below to get a taste of CARMA's latest incarnation.
Reactions
Live nearby? Work here? Just have a reaction about this? Share your thoughts with us!
Need help translating? Check out Google Translate.
Add a Reaction
Fields marked with a * are required.
| Name * | |
| E-mail * | |
| Website | |
| Your Reaction * | |
| Subscribe to CARMA Newsletter | |





