Venice (city) |
|
|---|---|
| Location |
Illinois United States North America |
| Total Power Plants | 5 |
| Red Alerts |
|
| Elected Officials |
Rep. Jerry Costello (D) 2408 Rayburn HOB tel: 202-225-5661 | fax: 202-225-0285
Sen. Richard Durbin (D)
332 Dirksen Senate Office Building tel: 202-224-2152 | fax: 202-228-0400 dick@durbin.senate.gov
Sen. Barack Obama (D)
713 Hart Senate Office Building tel: 202-224-2854 | fax: 202-228-1372 |
Power Trends
For more about the terms or data used here, search the Glossary, learn All About Icons, or check out our FAQs. Information on plant specifics can be found here. If you use the data, please see our citation policy.
| Tons CO2 | MWh Energy | Intensity | % Fossil | % Hydro | % Nuclear | % Other Renewable | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000: | 2,334,838 | 2,363,840 | 1,975 | 95.64 | 0 | 0 | 2.61 |
| Present: | 3,254,685 | 3,473,294 | 1,874 | 99.35 | 0 | 0 | 0.65 |
| Future: | 3,299,043 | 3,499,930 | 1,885 | 99.35 | 0 | 0 | 0.65 |
Top Power Producing Plants in the Venice Area
Highest CO2 Emitting Plants in the Venice Area
| Tons CO2 | MWh Energy | Intensity | |||
|
|
North America
United States
Illinois
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
2,133,061
3,001,465
3,021,466
|
2,057,577
3,040,827
3,062,841
|
2,073
1,974
1,973
|
|
|
North America
United States
Illinois
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
59,582
177,661
198,355
|
41,292
295,275
296,386
|
2,886
1,203
1,338
|
|
|
North America
United States
Illinois
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
41,682
42,172
42,507
|
63,605
64,413
64,965
|
1,311
1,309
1,309
|
|
|
North America
United States
Missouri
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
32,295
33,387
34,823
|
110,013
72,780
75,107
|
587
917
927
|
|
|
North America
United States
Missouri
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
68,219
0
1,893
|
91,353
0
631
|
1,494
0
6,000
|
Blog
For the time being, there will be no change to the data on the site, which remains unchanged from the CARMA 2.0 release in August, 2008. Our hope is to make the upgraded database public within six months.
Check back with the CARMA blog for updates as the new database comes together.

The airwaves have recently been filled with advertisements heralding a plethora of clean energy technologies. GE promoted its smart grid technologies in a Wizard of Oz-themed Super Bowl ad. Vestas, the largest wind turbine manufacturer in the world, has branded itself No. 1 in Modern Energy. Various groups have designed commercials touting the potential of "clean coal," including a GE ad featuring models-turned-miners (tagline: "Harnessing the power of coal is looking more beautiful every day."). And environmental groups have struck back against the branding of coal as "clean" with satirical advertisements (tagline: "Clean coal harnesses the awesome power of the word ‘clean!’". In this maelstrom of marketing, who can say which clean energy technology is best?
Nearly two years after the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to determine whether greenhouse gases (GHGs) pose a threat to peoples’ health or welfare – the first step toward regulation -- the EPA this week issued a draft rule on a national GHG registry:
On March 2, thousands of people are expected to engage in mass civil disobedience at the coal-fired Capitol Power Plant in Washington, DC. The protest, which is expected to include NASA climate scientist Jim Hanson, author Wendell Barry, and environmentalist Bill McKibben is timed to coincide with the final day of PowerShift09, a four-day "National Youth Summit" that aims to bring 10,000 students to Washington to lobby for action on climate change.Go to carma.org/blog/earth/ to learn more, or check out the screenshots below to get a taste of CARMA's latest incarnation.
Reactions
Live nearby? Work here? Just have a reaction about this? Share your thoughts with us!
Need help translating? Check out Google Translate.
Add a Reaction
Fields marked with a * are required.
| Name * | |
| E-mail * | |
| Website | |
| Your Reaction * | |
| Subscribe to CARMA Newsletter | |





