BLUFFVIEW |
|
|---|---|
| Operating Company |
FARMINGTON ELEC UTIL |
| Plant Location |
Farmington,
New Mexico San Juan County, 87401 United States North America |
| Elected Officials |
Rep. Tom Udall (D) 1410 Longworth HOB tel: 202-225-6190 | fax: 202-226-1331
Sen. Pete Domenici (R)
328 Hart Senate Office Building tel: 202-224-6621 | fax: 202-228-0900 senator_domenici@domenici.senate.gov
Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D)
703 Hart Senate Office Building tel: 202-224-5521 | fax: 202-224-2852 |
Power Trends
For more about the terms or data used here, search the Glossary, learn All About Icons, or check out our FAQs. Information on plant specifics can be found here. If you use the data, please see our citation policy.
| Tons CO2 | MWh Energy | Intensity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000: | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Present: | 82,663 | 145,745 | 1,134 |
| Future: | 90,053 | 158,626 | 1,135 |
Top Power Producing Plants in the Region
Highest CO2 Emitting Plants in the Region
| Tons CO2 | MWh Energy | Intensity | |||
|
|
North America
United States
New Mexico
Fruitland
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
16,900,000
15,100,000
15,200,000
|
14,900,000
15,700,000
15,800,000
|
2,269
1,922
1,921
|
|
|
North America
United States
New Mexico
Waterflow
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
14,500,000
11,500,000
11,600,000
|
12,400,000
12,300,000
12,400,000
|
2,343
1,865
1,866
|
|
|
North America
United States
New Mexico
Prewitt
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
2,023,346
1,967,641
1,983,021
|
1,804,546
1,959,707
1,975,646
|
2,242
2,008
2,007
|
|
|
North America
United States
New Mexico
Hobbs
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
873,270
958,990
988,376
|
1,453,157
1,459,100
1,508,812
|
1,202
1,314
1,310
|
|
|
North America
United States
New Mexico
Bloomfield
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
502,369
513,977
528,772
|
223,392
228,965
236,082
|
4,498
4,490
4,480
|
Blog
For the time being, there will be no change to the data on the site, which remains unchanged from the CARMA 2.0 release in August, 2008. Our hope is to make the upgraded database public within six months.
Check back with the CARMA blog for updates as the new database comes together.

The airwaves have recently been filled with advertisements heralding a plethora of clean energy technologies. GE promoted its smart grid technologies in a Wizard of Oz-themed Super Bowl ad. Vestas, the largest wind turbine manufacturer in the world, has branded itself No. 1 in Modern Energy. Various groups have designed commercials touting the potential of "clean coal," including a GE ad featuring models-turned-miners (tagline: "Harnessing the power of coal is looking more beautiful every day."). And environmental groups have struck back against the branding of coal as "clean" with satirical advertisements (tagline: "Clean coal harnesses the awesome power of the word ‘clean!’". In this maelstrom of marketing, who can say which clean energy technology is best?
Nearly two years after the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to determine whether greenhouse gases (GHGs) pose a threat to peoples’ health or welfare – the first step toward regulation -- the EPA this week issued a draft rule on a national GHG registry:
On March 2, thousands of people are expected to engage in mass civil disobedience at the coal-fired Capitol Power Plant in Washington, DC. The protest, which is expected to include NASA climate scientist Jim Hanson, author Wendell Barry, and environmentalist Bill McKibben is timed to coincide with the final day of PowerShift09, a four-day "National Youth Summit" that aims to bring 10,000 students to Washington to lobby for action on climate change.Go to carma.org/blog/earth/ to learn more, or check out the screenshots below to get a taste of CARMA's latest incarnation.
Reactions
Live nearby? Work here? Just have a reaction about this? Share your thoughts with us!
Need help translating? Check out Google Translate.
Add a Reaction
Fields marked with a * are required.
| Name * | |
| E-mail * | |
| Website | |
| Your Reaction * | |
| Subscribe to CARMA Newsletter | |





