SUMAS-1 |
|
|---|---|
| Operating Company |
CALPINE CORP Stock Symbol: OTC:CPNLQ |
| Plant Location |
Sumas,
Washington Whatcom County, 98295 United States North America |
| Elected Officials |
Rep. Rick Larsen (D) 107 Cannon HOB tel: 202-225-2605 | fax: 202-225-4420
Sen. Patty Murray (D)
173 Russell Senate Office Building tel: 202-224-2621 | fax: 202-224-0238 senator_murray@murray.senate.gov
Sen. Maria Cantwell (D)
717 Hart Senate Office Building tel: 202-224-3441 | fax: 202-228-0514 maria@cantwell.senate.gov |
Power Trends
For more about the terms or data used here, search the Glossary, learn All About Icons, or check out our FAQs. Information on plant specifics can be found here. If you use the data, please see our citation policy.
| Tons CO2 | MWh Energy | Intensity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000: | 679,193 | 1,246,367 | 1,090 |
| Present: | 693,886 | 920,709 | 1,507 |
| Future: | 713,331 | 942,540 | 1,514 |
Top Power Producing Plants in the Region
Highest CO2 Emitting Plants in the Region
| Tons CO2 | MWh Energy | Intensity | |||
|
|
North America
United States
Washington
Centralia
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
10,300,000
10,500,000
10,600,000
|
9,400,803
9,312,409
9,384,924
|
2,201
2,249
2,252
|
|
|
North America
United States
Washington
Chehalis
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
0
2,244,047
2,381,329
|
0
1,933,448
2,022,891
|
0
2,321
2,354
|
|
|
North America
United States
Washington
Vancouver
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
1,458,630
1,498,266
1,551,661
|
2,710,000
1,729,975
1,773,869
|
1,076
1,732
1,749
|
|
|
North America
United States
Washington
Anacortes
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
602,452
757,090
777,836
|
1,021,911
1,022,834
1,049,699
|
1,179
1,480
1,482
|
|
|
North America
United States
Washington
Sumas
|
2000:
Present:
Future:
|
679,193
693,886
713,331
|
1,246,367
920,709
942,540
|
1,090
1,507
1,514
|
Blog
For the time being, there will be no change to the data on the site, which remains unchanged from the CARMA 2.0 release in August, 2008. Our hope is to make the upgraded database public within six months.
Check back with the CARMA blog for updates as the new database comes together.

The airwaves have recently been filled with advertisements heralding a plethora of clean energy technologies. GE promoted its smart grid technologies in a Wizard of Oz-themed Super Bowl ad. Vestas, the largest wind turbine manufacturer in the world, has branded itself No. 1 in Modern Energy. Various groups have designed commercials touting the potential of "clean coal," including a GE ad featuring models-turned-miners (tagline: "Harnessing the power of coal is looking more beautiful every day."). And environmental groups have struck back against the branding of coal as "clean" with satirical advertisements (tagline: "Clean coal harnesses the awesome power of the word ‘clean!’". In this maelstrom of marketing, who can say which clean energy technology is best?
Nearly two years after the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to determine whether greenhouse gases (GHGs) pose a threat to peoples’ health or welfare – the first step toward regulation -- the EPA this week issued a draft rule on a national GHG registry:
On March 2, thousands of people are expected to engage in mass civil disobedience at the coal-fired Capitol Power Plant in Washington, DC. The protest, which is expected to include NASA climate scientist Jim Hanson, author Wendell Barry, and environmentalist Bill McKibben is timed to coincide with the final day of PowerShift09, a four-day "National Youth Summit" that aims to bring 10,000 students to Washington to lobby for action on climate change.Go to carma.org/blog/earth/ to learn more, or check out the screenshots below to get a taste of CARMA's latest incarnation.
Reactions
Live nearby? Work here? Just have a reaction about this? Share your thoughts with us!
Need help translating? Check out Google Translate.
Add a Reaction
Fields marked with a * are required.
| Name * | |
| E-mail * | |
| Website | |
| Your Reaction * | |
| Subscribe to CARMA Newsletter | |





